Ann: Continuation of TIA, page-14

excellent news, shows multiple suggestions

1) no end date in place meaning CATH have basically said we are here as long as it takes , remember this TIA also is money in escrow for CATH - 20m to be precise locked in for 2 years no, thats a committment no matter which way you look at it

2) It also reinforces that AVZ was using the 3 month extensions to build up headlines... I think that was clever, keep the headlines up and keep the pressure for DRC to awcknoledge the license or lose the biggest battery producer.

This however means AVZ have decided to change strategy , but that was known with the ISCID case and at this point in the game - I think we all agree that its the right direction.

Now the biased non-holders will say China is playing a game. The game is this
Step 1) Bribe your way into a register, get caught, get your reputation damaged and kicked out of the books
Step 2) Commit 20m for 2 years in the hope that step 1 succeeds and you get Step 2, but if AVZ lost 15% would they have sold 24%? Nope, step 2 is therefore at conflict with step 1
Step 3) get a bunch of non-holders to junk this forum - Success! China got its way no this one..