Ozblue you have enunciated well what I suggested weeks ago....

Ozblue you have enunciated well what I suggested weeks ago. ---->

Every time the company released a glowing positive report (I used the word "propaganda") the share price dropped.
Pump and Sell?
This would mean those in the know could unload at each revelation?
But then again at the time the management may have believed from their first hand information that all was well and reported such positive progress to the best of their ability at regular intervals.
One wonders whether some of the supportive posts at these times weren't "Tony Posts".
No I do not mean posts by Tony himself.

I also presented a thought/opinion that Pybar might have been a prop too.
That they may have been misled?
That they might have "co-operated"?
That they might have been funded in their uptake?
Also they might have decided with their first hand on site information that the mine was working brilliantly, no problems, great future and started accumulating on market for all to see.


Always thought that the emphasis on exploration was our of kilter.
Questioned whether this apparently extraneous and fund draining activity wasn't to set up for a take-over perhaps at a price as low as 18 cents. Yes as low as 18 cents seemed a preposterous suggestion at the time.

It appears to me that it is the share holders who should be suing the management.

Although invested a defined and limited part of my finances after wisely getting out of CCU before it folded and now this second run will not return to the risky rising stars again, ever.

Dislaimer.
These comments are just a figment of my imagination of course.
I have no information!