Thanks Sitight. Frustrating that all we have is heresay. If the original results showed "Burn wound infections consisted of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including multi-drug resistant and ‘biofilm’ categorised forms" and these were able to be cleared with what appeared at the time to be 100% efficacy in half the expected trial time, then any improvement on that will surely gain attention. I had wondered if they might have trouble with biofilms so that aspect alone was impressive for me. I wonder if they had to improve because results dropped off with subsequent treatments or other patients, or if they simply found they could make it easier or more effective. Did what you heard give any indication on this? Thanks for reply.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)