I might be able to help a bit. In my opinion, these results are...

I might be able to help a bit. In my opinion, these results are encouraging but pretty early stage, they are reasonably skinny but high grade - so typical for Cobar-style deposits, you can see on the plan view that the design was to increase the strike length of the mineralisation by drilling along strike to he northwest and one deep hole along strike in the southeast, some of the holes in the northwest were successful (i.e. BJRC015, 016, 017 & 022) so they have added another 100 or 150m or so to strike length which is double what it was from the existing drilling. As the technical comments say, the mineralisation is complex and maybe a cross-section at this early stage won't be very informative except to say that the geology is complex and needs more drilling, I'm sure that's what Kylie Prendergast would say...

The other thing to note is that the Cu soil geochem dies off pretty quickly along strike, and so do the drill results so far, so possibly not much strike extent but it could be a lot of depth. Again - vertical orebodies are fairly normal for the Cobar area. Hole 18 is interesting - not completely dead out there but might be an offset or change in direction?