re: Ann: Copper Result Alteration Signature S... I think it is important to realise that the earlier 116 m at 2.4% Cu were in a breccia pipe.
The 114 m at 0.22% reported today are a completely different kettle of fish, as we are now looking for the big game, the feeder source at depth. It is important not to confuse these.
The breccia pipes are small, but higher grade, whereas the main porphyry at depth (if proven) will be much larger, but lower grade.
re: Ann: Copper Result Alteration Signature S... I think it is...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
