Ann: Corporate Presentation, page-89

It's the truth, and you know it.

1. You used to be the most honest, and harshest, critic of RH on here, for years. But, suddenly you started trying to suppress all criticism of management, and try to paint everything in 'positive' lights. We've all seen the fake switch.

2. You have literally said to everyone, several times, that it's negative comments on hotcopper that have brought the share price to these lows, and are keeping it down. And you've said that we should now stop complaining and be more 'positive' going forward on hotcopper, to push tye price up. Your words, not mine. We've all read your words.

3. For the last 12 months, but especially these last few months, you've been trying to push a narrative that the reason the share price is this low is because of a takeover conspiracy. Again, and agsin, you repeat this narrative. We've all read your words.

4. Recently, you have been trying to convince everyone that it's actually a good thing that RH didn't complete 'substantial commencement'. This is wrong, and a very dishonest narrative. You've begun citing Mike Young's comments that a few more approvals remained after completing the 'substantial commencement' milestone.
This is new narrative of yours is a red herring. Because, completing 'substantial commencement' would have legally awarded us the environmental approval to mine, despite the uranium mining ban. It would've made Toro legally untouchable. That was what the McGowan deal was all about. The few other remaining approvals, were secondary, and flowed from completing the environmental approval. The key was 'substantial commencement'. Vimy completed theirs, and that is why Borschoff bought it, and not us. Vimy became untouchable, and legally allowed to mine uranium in WA, despite the ban. RH gave up our chance (without informing holders), and we became stuck inside the ban.

But, alright...lets leave it to the other members of this forum to decide.

Guys, what in my statement above is false?