In regards to the legal appeal being made by VAN against ZAG it is in relation to the fact that ZAG was awarded a 4.1% interest in the K2 mine.
If, at some future point of time, Vango decides to develop the K2 mine, Zuleika will be required to contribute 4.1% of those costs as well as contribute 4.1% of yearly holding costs of the tenement.
Hopefully VAN's new appeal will reduce this percentage down to 0% as it has already been dropped from 11.87% to a 4.1% interest in the K2 MINE.
One might feel that If ZAG had been actually serious about having a professional JV with VAN then they would have continued to commit proper funds to it rather than just walking away? (Please correct me if I am wrong).
or
If the courts continue to feel that ZAG do actually have a legal claim to a % of K2 then perhaps VAN could simply pay a $ amount to ZAG based on their previous minimal JV exploration costs?
Either way it shouldn't really be a deal breaker IMHO as long as costs are kept fair and minimal...
GLTAH+DYOR
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CYL
- Ann: Corporate update
Ann: Corporate update, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CYL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$3.36 |
Change
0.170(5.33%) |
Mkt cap ! $759.3M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$3.20 | $3.40 | $3.20 | $4.533M | 1.369M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | $3.32 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$3.36 | 11018 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 3.320 |
1 | 3030 | 3.300 |
4 | 5114 | 3.250 |
1 | 5632 | 3.240 |
2 | 2157 | 3.190 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.360 | 11018 | 2 |
3.370 | 42507 | 2 |
3.400 | 11423 | 2 |
3.410 | 5517 | 1 |
3.420 | 10372 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 18/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CYL (ASX) Chart |