Hi UFX
et.al.,Substandard QC work by all involved to say the least. That said, in my opinion the results remain encouraging and GRS-CNJ need to follow on with delivering
reliable PGE's assay figures, hopefully in the 2-3g/t range. I've taken a "quick" look at all the the GAL and GSR-CNJ holes to date and noted where they have reported heavily disseminated sulphides and disseminated sulphides, remembering your re-emphasis UFX that the onsite visual interpretations of heavily disseminated versus disseminated sulphides will vary with each interpreter/geologist. Assuming the reported visuals are reasonable, I plotted the holes reported with heavily disseminated sulphides as a solid green dot (thickness m) (
yes these holes also had disseminated sulphides logged as well), and holes reported with disseminated sulphides open green circle (thickness m) (
no
heavily disseminated sulphides were logged in these holes). I have not plotted holes where only weakly disseminated sulphides were reported.
I have done the same on the TMI-1VD aeromagnetic image below. All holes GSR-CNJ have drilled to date, have intersected some thickness of heavily disseminated sulphides (y
es with disseminated sulphides as well). Going forward, in my opinion there will be holes GSR-CNJ drill where only disseminated and/or weakly disseminated sulphides occur. We may even hit some massive sulphides as GAL have demonstrated.
From first glances, the level of sulphide dissemination appears to increase in a west to east sense towards the hot colours on the aeromagnetic image. Time will tell.
![https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/4646/4646616-ae1eb647a1720ad2fdfa008d4563fba9.jpg](https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/4646/4646616-ae1eb647a1720ad2fdfa008d4563fba9.jpg)
![https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/4646/4646600-883fd59ca980eddb1ab4e38075030293.jpg](https://hotcopper.com.au/data/attachments/4646/4646600-883fd59ca980eddb1ab4e38075030293.jpg)
Kind regards OldGeo