Not the appropriate occasion for a typo! RE: Letter to the ATO,...

Not the appropriate occasion for a typo!

RE: Letter to the ATO, 28th July 2021.

In the signing off, it is printed;

"For an on behalf of Pilbara Minerals Limited"

To all of you at HQ; take a break, have kit-kat.

Don't worry, it's not going to affect the SP.
How many of us preview our comments here for miss-spellings and poor grammar?
If our oversights were to affect the SP, then we might all be broke.

I have an enquiry.

A couple of people have recently described themselves as being 'significant' investors. To what does that equate. Are we perhaps in the presence of board members?

Is the judge really expected to accept this as an 'oversight'?
If it is an 'oversight', then I hope that the management (through the company's barristers) will be asked to present a strategy for the implementation of new protocols & processes to ensure the 'please explain' from the ATO doesn't happen again. Especially around the time of quarterly results being announced.

When I think about the look on the faces of many a person at ASIC and the ATO, like many of us, I too sit in disbelief.

I must now stop such thoughts as I think I am about to vomit.

It's certainly 'one for the cake' but I'm sure there's also many a corporate leader viewing these proceedings with a smirk on their face as they remenice on their occasion to hault trading whilst before the court. Very unpleasant!

This is certainly a 'story for around the camp-fire' but I will try to refrain from bragging about the ROI.

Anyway, lets us move forward.