Hi Debono,
To quote that well knows saying "the definition of stupidity is trying the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result". My view is that, although a shame it was not done earlier, ONLY change at the top level can potentially rescue this company. The legal case will now have to play out but you cannot have a board run this company succesfully where NOT A SINGLE director has any industry experience (and, worse, they ignore industry advice).
Even Cygnet, who heavily backed Matt Birney in particular, must know that was a mistake (in and of itself that is not a crime - we all make mistakes). Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Emotionally, however, it will no doubt be difficult for Cygnet to change horses again but its the only way. Might be worth a chat to somebody at Cygnet (assuming they haven an open mind).
IMO: with a new Board there is a 10-15% chance this company can be rescued. Without it, the company will not recover (don't forget the Con Notes issue is just about to be played out too - massive cash out the door or massive dillution....both crappy outcomes).
....just bought that fishing rod....
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CKK
- Ann: Court Order to Take Possession of GT3000
Ann: Court Order to Take Possession of GT3000 , page-32
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LU7
Discover the strong preliminary feasibility of the Bécancour Lithium Refinery, showcasing resilience in a low pricing environment and a strategic plan to capitalize on future price recoveries