I hear what you are saying @imback but where I struggle with 'recruitment' is the fact that the California group of hospitals claimed that they had enrolled 30 patients in the trial (10%) in less than two months through Dr Bowdish blog that was later removed. While we weren't supposed to know this information obviously - we now do .... hehe
The following hospital groups (see link) were all added to the clinical trials website on 1 May 2020 (6 in total) the same day along with the California group - you would assume they were all brought online / up to speed around the same time ? Therefore that would only need the other 5 hospital groups to recruit 12 participants in two months to get to the initial 90 people - a little over one a week. That excludes any new hospital groups brought on after this date so I am hoping we are more advanced than most think - but just my musings while we wait
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04371393?A=1&B=2&C=merged#StudyPageTop
I figure we are well past half way by now and we could see full recruitment before the interim analysis is undertaken ... I think all parties would prefer 100% recruitment to ensure there is in fact 'robust' data ... I also believe now that the death numbers are again on the rise in the USA that whatever residual is required to fulfill 100% recruitment, it will happen well and truly prior to the end of August.... I guess we will see as the month progresses ?
@kovey
2. Severely sick people on ventilators aren't probably in the best frame of mind to make a decision to be part of a novice trial; so I'd assume their next of kin have to make the decision on their behalf. That decision is going to be a hard one.
Nice points raised in your post but I respectfully disagree with this comment as I believe that patients receive SOC regardless of the participation in the trial or not ... I know if given the choice to enroll my loved one in this trial (even with a 50% chance of receiving placebo) I would jump at it as I believe they really have nothing to lose and a 50% chance of everything to gain - but then again I have read all the reports
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MSB
- Ann: COVID-19/GVHD Update, Quarterly Report and Appendix 4C
Ann: COVID-19/GVHD Update, Quarterly Report and Appendix 4C, page-199
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MSB (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
99.5¢ |
Change
-0.015(1.49%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.136B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$1.02 | $1.02 | 99.5¢ | $2.005M | 1.991M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 14424 | 99.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$1.00 | 63643 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 14424 | 0.995 |
10 | 237639 | 0.990 |
3 | 56872 | 0.985 |
5 | 60954 | 0.980 |
2 | 20000 | 0.975 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.000 | 63643 | 1 |
1.005 | 15118 | 3 |
1.010 | 20000 | 2 |
1.015 | 92607 | 4 |
1.020 | 174044 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 19/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
MSB (ASX) Chart |