Why would this business arrangement between Tah and Jin not be continued?
Any thoughts?
1. Tah owns 10% of Jin so Jin's success is beneficial
2. Tah receives the full price of all tickets sold on Jin. (maybe Tah wants those customers on their database to upsell to. But this is offset by getting additional marketing and sales staff for free)
3. Anything goes wrong on the Tah platform there's another option (for example Tah website crashes tickets can be sold by Jin on that day).
Would Mcdonalds be unhappy if Hungry Jacks was bying Big Macs and selling them in Hungry Jacks.
Probably because Mcdonalds wants to sell the fries and coke also.
Any insights greatly appreciated
Why would this business arrangement between Tah and Jin not be...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add JIN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$13.27 |
Change
-0.050(0.38%) |
Mkt cap ! $835.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $13.32 | $13.39 | $13.22 | $1.420M | 106.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 6296 | $13.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $13.27 | 3538 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 18/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| JIN (ASX) Chart |