Nice one@Grfe4It is interesting to note the conventional free...

Nice one@Grfe4
It is interesting to note the conventional free flowing zone potentially contributing the lions share to the unified 7 zone flow rate.
As this conventional zone was somewhat of a pleasant accidental discovery, I assume the modelling Greg C, SK et al ORIGINALY did must have had a pretty decent unified single flow modelled output WITHOUT the inclusion of the additional free flowing conventional deeper zone.
i.e. I assume their modelling must have produced results that closely approximated commercially viable rates (as a combined sum of the parts rates from FMTC, sandstones etc), and on that basis- was the catalyst for the excitement evidenced by Greg, Neil etc from the absolute get-go?
What was that modelled combined FMTC+ tight sandstones figure ?....maybe the "base case" numbers as per the Next investor extract below- i.e. 2-5 mmscf?....enough on it's own to warrant "commercially viable" ?

So, with the potential to now add an "accelerant" flow rate contributor in the deeper free flowing conventional zone pushing towards a 5mmscf just by itself as you outline, we then (assumption) could well see an ultimate combined zone rate circa 7-10 mmscf per day??