Ann: December 2014 Quarterly Report and Appendix 5B, page-9

That's worthy of a response Doc.

The notation to @leverage is in direct to his posting of "your constant inference that SSN is will not survive is both unnecessary and not informed" not to mention his initial welcome mat of the "what's your agenda" that is pasted on anyone who doesn't give a half time rahrah speech. Since according to @leverage I am not informed then where can I find this information and data that I am missing? I think I have posted numerous items with links that are subsequently referenced that also have positive items in them for SSN (like the Helms's preso on the breakevens in different counties). I supplied a CLR slide - but since it was note SSN specific I'm surprised @leverage didn't want that booted to the oil & gas forum. What happens in the Bakken ought to be of interest to SSN shareholders who are interested in fundamentals.

Having donkey-kong games with Buc is fine - there is as much written saying price goes down, demand is down as saying price going up and demand going up. It ought to be useful to see the bigger picture - if you are an O&G investor (yet to pick on Leverage again these don't seem to be directed to the oil & gas forum).

Do I need to justify my thoughts - No - just the same as everyone else. Is it useful to substantiate points and data with 3rd party references - absolutely.

What do I like? If its a general question then wine, women, song, golf, sports, good company and making money.