These results need to be compared to sedimentary deposits, if...

These results need to be compared to sedimentary deposits, if you compare it to porphyry results it looks bad but when compared to other sedimentary deposits the results make a lot more sense.

I think people have an expectation of hitting the feeder zone and getting 1000m of copper like we're down in South America.

Visually, take that 1000m and flip it horizontally instead of vertically to imagine what the deposit is shaping up to look like as we continue drilling it.

I won't comment on these particular results until the assays come back other than visually they look pretty normal for sed hosted. I am eagerly awaiting the resource expansion as that will likely be the biggest driver of the SP moving forward due to discount rates. Both growing the resource and moving more of it into "high confidence" will allow a greater % of the in ground value to be allocated.