Hy QUOTE: Of course they can modify, but generally, they try to...

Hy

QUOTE: Of course they can modify, but generally, they try to optimise the project for a particular outcome, this may be for lower Capex, higher NPV, lower opex etc.
Yes they can and do/ dit it. There´s nothing bad with it, WKT did it different than GPX

Hy Natos,
i am not THAT expert, neither can i articulate acurate in english to transport my knowlage from german to english. My thoughs are that because of a less capex and opex there are NOW different premises/ thoughts for the math of the NPV, comparing the PFS and the DFS. The DFS shows with a high propebility a higher NPV with half output over a longer LOM. Saying this, i haven´t simulated the DFS with the original numbers. I have not THAT time to proof everything in 100% detail for other´s.

For me i know everything i need.

Exciting times ahead, and shurely better times