This is not a dig, as I do not think you were trying to be...

This is not a dig, as I do not think you were trying to be funny, but you can not imagine, how the 27 most vocal posters on this forum would disagree with you.

Since 2017, I have been labeled a consistent "Down Ramper", disgruntled ex- employee, many many negative slang.

This is a Venture Company, question whether it should have listed, but it did, as long as there is funding, they can improve by just changing course. Cyber has not been solved.

Net has legitimately 146 competitors, in this sub category, check out FORTINET, long time company, Chinese partnerships, they have listed products in every category and description that NET plays in. Why does Gartner or any other TRQW not include them in any research note. Why doesn't Blue Tech in San Diego talk about and sell the product.


The only reason to open foreign partnerships in my opinion, it the ability to expense travel to those countries. Find any other Cyber Company heralding Greece or Pakistan as key markets.

The got debt from an experienced local tech source, and then somehow got a group that had been selling, to buy some more.

Now find something you can use the new Capital on, to be current, make sales with, demonstrate in country. Authoritarian regimes and other Nation State interests are not focusing on Network Obfuscation or Software Edge Configuration, again, go to a well known company like Fortinet and download lots of Marketing collateral and software manuals.

The Board and the new money know how to adjust, JT understands who he can call. Thus a solution can be crafted and you are right back into the game.

The price of the play is 2.5.