What a crap journal. In the scientific arena this is like publishing your results in the NT News. The journal has an impact factor of around 1 which places it in the 3rd quartile of comparable research publications (i..e the bottom 75%). As a scientist I would not publish in such a journal and question why this journal was chosen to convey the findings.
It suggests they were rejected by the more prestigious journals.
Perhaps someone from the board of PIQ might like to respond?
What a crap journal. In the scientific arena this is like...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $47.42M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 30.5¢ | 30.5¢ | 28.5¢ | $187.1K | 634.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 81754 | 28.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 31.0¢ | 1000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.57pm 27/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PIQ (ASX) Chart |