Correct me if I'm wrong.
From what I see, PDI drill angle is -50 deg and I took a quick look at one other miners recent drill result, their drill angle is at -60 deg and with shorter length of mineralisation but with much higher mineralisation within the length
This means PDI have a thicker ore body compare to the one with -60 degree. And PDI have much longer length of mineralisation but much lower mineralisation within length compare to other. And the interception start pretty close from surface.
So wondering which one is more important? length of mineralisation or mineralisation within length?
Personally, I think length of meneralisation and depth of interception is much important. Will eager to see what are the next result will be.
Please let me know if I am wrong in interpreting the current announcement.
Correct me if I'm wrong.From what I see, PDI drill angle is -50...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PDI (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $469.3M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.0¢ | 20.5¢ | 19.8¢ | $60.08K | 300.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 244975 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.5¢ | 445248 | 22 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.57pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PDI (ASX) Chart |