Once again Ozblue, you are selective in quotes picking out...

Once again Ozblue, you are selective in quotes picking out sentences rather than reading words in conjunction with the rest of the paragraphs and indeed the tenor of the whole 1 Dec. 21 announcement.

IMO, your argument is poorly based and tenuous at best. You continue to bombard these threads with semantics. You launched a diatribe of misinformation regarding the supposed change in language between the two announcements. When you are called out, you resort to type by again using selected sentences without the covering context of the overall announcement details. Then you launch into another round of opinionated vitriol against management and the supposed failure of SGQ as an explorer.

If you attack the company on these threads, you will be called out when your assertions are wrong or misguided. This is not a game of semantics. It is a business of posters buying/holding/selling shares in SGQ based on their individual situation and assessments.

In this case, you made poorly thought out comments and IMO you made a mistake and are now desperately trying to defend your assertions. May I suggest you again read your initial criticism regarding the language used in the two announcements and then carefully reread the two announcements objectively.

In particular reread the two paragraphs I highlighted and then read this from the second announcement and you will see that there is no discernible
change in language from one announcement to the other.

“The north-south seismic lines completed at Mt Alexander straddled the Cathedrals Belt and stretched to
the north into our 100%-owned Exploration Licence 29/548, where an underexplored east-west oriented
structure – the Transits Belt – has been identified by shallow drilling. Importantly, Cathedrals Belt style
host lithologies were also confirmed in the drilling.
“The seismic data has mapped the Transits Belt structure as dipping to the north, similar to the highly
mineralised intrusive-host structure in the Cathedrals Belt to the south.
“S2 – the new, large target identified in the Transits Belt – has the same seismic properties as S1 in the
Cathedrals Belt and just like S1 is interpreted to be a target for massive nickel-copper sulphides.

Mulac1