another smart ar$e I see.///your 1st paper shows you need to...

another smart ar$e I see.
///your 1st paper shows you need to reduce proteinuria by at least 50% or to below 1g /day in the 1st year to be protective long term
///your 2nd paper says reducing proteinuria by at least 40% and to below 1.5 g/ day gives better long term outcome in fsg
///your 3rd paper does have some charts at the end with GFR slope change by every 10% drop in proteinuria, but they don't correlate this with any quantifiable survival outcome or time to end stage kidney disease.
....so I ask again, the SPECIFIC claim "10% proteinuria decline gives 5-6 extra years life" ,on what is that based, where is that stated?
if anything your 1st 2 papers highlight the relative weakness of the dimx drug because it hasn't demonstrated anything like those sorts of proteinuria reductions, has it?