Ann: Disclosure under Listing Rule 4.3D, page-55

Whereas the list is in fact ambiguous because it does not take into account official documentation issued to the market regarding the substantial change in shares held by management and institutional figures with a strong participation; from a summary reading it seems that behind Citycorp that acts as a brocker, there is the figure we are looking for and which I believe is key,
moving and focusing attention, however, on the new aspects emerged from the premise of Pilcker and related release of the list, the question inquetante is what happened to the actions of the greatest exponent of Neuren on the scientific and managerial level that is Glass ??? Pilcher stated that the document he was supplying to us in essence would not have been of any use and interpretation because it was vitiated by variables; I am of the opinion that as long as it has anything to do with the little trader it may be fine, but when it will officially publish it (I do not think it will be of the same content) it will have to deal with interpretations of institutions that can read these positions and relative numbers very well.
the one on which the Pilcher should be clear without any premise of convenience in the face of a retail is that the position different to today has in the Glass shareholder and how they will be framed in the eventuality of a phase 3 / partnership options that will be converted that concern them person together with the rest of the executives we know. I also ask myself these questions since the actions of Glass (1 million abundant) according to his list disappear without prior notice.
I conclude by saying that at this point and from my point of view, if there are extraordinary circumstances in management, it would be more honest and appropriate to stop the market and not create further confusion to retail that until proven otherwise is the one that has supported with good determination the company from 2011 to today.