Fair point however how did these allegations by JW not constitute for an automatic dismissal on the spot, if it were to be true, instead we have this alleged thief running the trustees for Ci1, correct me if I’m wrong. General rule more often than not is a tit for tat backwards and forwards that ultimately leaves sure grapes for us all.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Disposal of a Partly-Owned Subsidiary
Fair point however how did these allegations by JW not...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CI1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
11.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.685M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CI1 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable