Ann: Divestment of equity interest in Resolution Life Australasia, page-25

There are other factors that inhibits the open sale of each of the investments. For example, the RL shareholding was in escrow and the only possible buyer during escrow was RL.however the shares are worth more to RL than any other party, so selling back (during escrow) to RL was a good move. Brings forward capital that may not be worth more I'm the future anyways. I am not privy or certain to the specific rules of the other investments however from what AMP have indicated is that each investment has certain restrictions as to the sale of said investment in regards to time frame (possible escrow). Assuming that both the investments in Chinese companies are open to market would be great advantage for AMP. If not, the growth in those investments alone would be beneficial. The US investment would be more open to market and ideal for an auction type process. we could be seeing another $1B to $1.5B coming in the door from the other investments.