Firstly, if cloud seeding (with silver or potassium iodide) was local 60 years ago, what have been the advances in said Tech over the past 60 years, given that many phones in those days required an operator to connect people and I'm now writing this on a smartphone on a platform accessible to almost all corners of the world?
Secondly, wrt to the polar vortex question, is the source of the narrative independent, and if not then who gains from the narrative and why can't it be debated openly. Are there any other inputs or processes (such as SRM or CIN) being used in this modelling and if not why?
The source I have used to formulate my opinion is independent. The source of the data is well established, trustworthy and their research spans 20 odd years.
This debate is advancing at a faster rate in the US from where I source my data than in Australia.
Many states in the US are writing legislation to stop geoengineering. Why are they doing this?
Then there is this article from December last year......
Do you really believe that other nations haven't developed similar technology or else why would the US do such tracking.
My aim is not to influence anybody but rather to open the door for all to walk through and formulate their own view wrt to the challenges the human race faces in the future.
In saying that, IMO the research should rely on reputable, independent & non political sources.
FMG Price at posting:
$18.65 Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)