I think it's you who's missed the point the WA1...

I think it's you who's missed the point the WA1 comparison is so unrealistic it's not funny ...... and that includes the mineral so many differences there that it's not even a comparison.

I don't have it in for MAN I want to invest AGAIN AS STATED but not until better outcomes and better disclosure is met I've been clear in this and to date there hasn't been any change or answers to my questions .

I never ever stated ASN had real cash so not sure why you would go there .

There's plenty to question with MAN and I have done exactly this .
You assume way too much and don't do anywhere near enough DD .
You think I never put ASN under this amount of scrutiny think again !
I'll give MAN a chance when they deliver something substantial which IMHO they haven't done yet . They have achieved Good hints at where their established partnerships would go but that's about it any basic DD would show what lies beneath as I have shown on previous posts .

SO despite all this I am still here posting what does that tell you ?
I'm here to invest but in something that's real not hints of something that's real .

@Sharebroker1 I agree there is plenty to like about MAN and yes the Uranium is interesting.
FYI ASN already has a Uranium Resource also IMHO well over 1 million pounds this has not been announced but I know it regardless because I've done my DD .

ASN directors have plenty of shares you only have to check and see .
At some point James will have to raise to progress MAN then we will see how much he gets diluted also .
Keep your bets you already stated 10c now 20c just do some DD before you post .

I see your tone has changed obviously James realises based on what you've told him that I'm not full of BS . Just remember I like you like the leverage MAN presents BUT it's only leverage if there's something tangible .

Impress me with some DD or vetting next time ...... really impress me find some historic uranium data for MAN - I bet you there's something......

Regards TT