Happy to elaborate @Rthek the "logic" as you put it is that a...

Happy to elaborate @Rthek the "logic" as you put it is that a business that proclaims to extract lithium has only 3 employees no proof of any claims
(if there is proof please point it out as others and I couldn't find any)
and as a result is not able to commercialise any of they're claims . So while it's nice for MAN to put a name to their selected technology it is highly unluckily (probable) that no leases MAN are utilising can exploited by ELECTROFLOW or at least not in the foreseeable future at a guess I would estimate minimum 10 years of collaboration between the 2 and funding for the period based on all other known Lithium extraction techniques as guide .
Despite the Naysayers the logic is pretty sound ......

Ohh and FYI if MAN are here in Utah for the long haul (doubtful) they would be hard pressed getting a better deal than signing up A1 Lithium as a technology provider with proven commercial extraction technology maybe do what Intrepid potash are doing and negotiate a Farm-in agreement with A1 Lithium stop playing Mickey Mouse games and start making some actual revenue for the MAN holders here .
Again all very sound logic ......
Tolling arrangements are staple in mining for an eternity......
Warmest Regards TT