I agree.I've had some long chats on the phone with DC and can...

I agree.

I've had some long chats on the phone with DC and can say that in my opinion he is a competent geologist and explorer. Ultimately, since he has joined the company the work conducted has been very well planned and executed, scientifically driven and constantly varying, taking into consideration new data.

Despite the outcome of this drilling campaign (positive or negative), they are executing in a way that has lots of successful presidents with the likes of Minitour, WA1 and perhaps most similarly Gold Road. Notwithstanding the commodities being different all 3 had in common the terrain centric approach. GOR even used PGN geosciences to develop the structural and lithological model off the mag imagery the same way to drive targeting.

I had another look at the drilling late last and early this year and it would seem to me that all indicators are pointing "Hotter" towards the IP anomaly and despite not having clear evidence of hole 11 piercing the NW structure or just tracking parallel to it, it is reasonable to suggest that this structure could be hosting significant sulphide independent of a gravity or magnetic anomaly.

Certainly, there is no reason why a ISCG system cannot be disseminated instead of massive and there is ample evidence of sulphide only mineralization in the Gawler Crator around the known deposits (Kathy Ehrig presented on this back in 2019).

As always im in for a little bit to keep it interesting and hoping to wipe lines when some nice assays come back.

And as far as the start, weather it is this week, next or in a month does not really matter.

Cheers,
CC