Originally posted by rick26
Of course, a half competent director could more than likely have managed Cancet in a way such as to increase shareholder value by this stage, couldn't they? Is all that very high grade, close to surface ore really only valued at our current piddling market capitalisation?
Care to respond to Rick’s salient question 71c4
As to directors being torched - my threads have been consistent from day dot and seem to be aligned with your wishes. Tell S/H’s the facts not stories, give full disclosure of why your doing what your doing esp. if it is a material deviation to the story you sold us all on in the first place.
I agree we are all grown up and must accept responsibility for what companies we invest in however that relies on the supposition that what you’ve been told is actually what is happening. Again as stated when investors see major strategy and/or key personnel changes with no explanation they automatically assume or perceive the worst. Any director that gets a little sookie at these stark cold realities needs to stop and think for a moment - how would they as an investor like it if they had to sit in a vacuum of explanation whilst seeing unexplained and what seem like inevitably random material changes occurring along with a corresponding capitulating share price.
Please enlighten all long suffering S/H’s - what else should we reasonably assume or are all being just unreasonable ??
(20min delay)