no, i mean...they either haven't completed ip surveys over the...

no, i mean...they either haven't completed ip surveys over the know mineralization, or surveys they have completed do not confirm that there is a specific signature for the known mineralization, why not just say so?
.
ip surveys are more relevent for massive sulphides and even if ip anomalies are present elsewhere in the same continuous prospective horizon they could be due to any number of minerals...different zones for different mineralization styles.

information i have from another company looking for disseminated sulphides in the same grade range as galileo is that ip surveys are a complete waste... so are they being scientific or just dragging out old cliches to get shareholders excited?

judging by the lukewarm response to the maiden resource announcement i think they are dragging out the cliches...i'm not saying the anomalies aren't worth drilling.