I want to but don't have any spare cash. The Root Bay pegmatite...

I want to but don't have any spare cash. The Root Bay pegmatite 1.4km to the left is interesting. Is it a continuation of the Root Bay system or a separate system? I guess we will find out over time. References to Trist are new as this name doesn't appear in the prospectus.

The result produced the chart below. The drilling reported was mainly in the middle of the JORC resource so you would expect robust results. A few more intercept lengths were reported than are red below.

8 of the intercept lengths relate to a new 5642500 string of drill holes. These have all come up with robust visual intercepts all have intercepts between 16m and 19.6m. I'm not sure what the JORC inferred estimate was for these holes, but they would appear to have at least met what was included in the inferred resource if not exceeded it. The most eastern hole on this string (RB-23-1073) hit 17m @ an estimated 12% Li so the pegmatite remains open at depth.

The infill of the 5642450 string has the sort of intercept widths expected. RB-23-1031 (14.3m @ a visual 7% Li aka under 1%) is the only slightly surprising result. Wait for the Assay on that one.

The JORC resource was ending at about the 5642400 string. These intercepts at 11.6m to 14.6m and good visual grades were probably stronger than GT1 expected. There's a 2.9m intercept that starts to define the edge at depth (or possibly a pinch in before a swell).

From the JORC resource picture, GT1 has assumed the pegmatite thins/ends around 5642600 so that planned string of holes will be interesting. A bunch of dusters and the inferred may drop slightly. A bunch of strong results and the size lifts. This has the feeling that 4Mt is going to flip into indicated and it may only take one more set of infill drilling to get to measured.