Ann: Drilling campaign successfully completed at Ardmore South, page-6

It is highly unusual to give no information on what the drilling intersected, no information on the rocks, no descriptions, no confirmation of the presence of sulphides or not (which would be significant information that they must know already), no reasons given for what was sampled and what was not.

my post in April: The two zones picked up by the IP seem to mirror the strike of the local rock units. Are they just reflecting particular rock units rather than sulphides? This might explain why the best rock chips don't mirror the IP anomalies. Certainly worth putting a few holes under the best rock chips and the best IP anomalies.

I also said: With the amount of oxide copper above it it is hard to image that there are not copper sulphides underneath, may well be some pyrite too.

Does the copper follow shears where the rock chip were taken but the IP reflects geology, conductive rock units?

We won't have long to wait. Hopefully loaded with copper sulphides, who knows.

DYOR. Not investment advice.