That's apparently how the ASX like it now, they seem to have...

That's apparently how the ASX like it now, they seem to have this rather rubbery inconsistent approach to presenting visual estimations of minerals in drill core that they don't regulate consistently, and then the ASX gets all pissy and issues speeding tickets when news inevitably leaks out from a drill site with sticks of spod or massive sulfides obvious to all and sundry on the rig, and they are wondering why the market is trading while uninformed! Go figure, huh?

Exactly like pXRF readings debacle from drill rigs during RC and Aircore drill campaigns, ASX and regulator tells everyone not to believe pXRF in RC chips, but the industry accepts and uses pXRF for most base metals as being reasonably indicative of metal concentrations in RC drill chips, to the point where they sometimes drill follow up drill holes based on pXRF readings alone, because the labs take so long to get assay results back. So if pXRF in RC chips is good enough to decide where to drill next, isn't that good enough to release them to the market so that investors can make decisions accordingly?

This is all the result of lawyers making up contradictory and ridiculous rules as they go along without reference to the actual industry experts who do this for a living and understand the science (i.e. geologists)