redfaces

I'm a simple man so why would Ian Frazer with all of his credibility and awards and all of the other medical doctors be working on this ovarian cancer vaccine if its a sham? Perhaps we should warn them now and write to all of the medical journals that have published and tell them that this ovarian cancer vaccine doesn't exist because RF said so on Hot Copper!(Don't take that as a good idea RF)

If there is no current ovarian cancer treatment as currently stated in the Prima announcement and also the Nature Journal said that CVac was the only late stage ovarian cancer vaccine how could there be no commercial market for CVac? Are we being conned on the largest scale?

Why is Dendreon worth $2.8bn and Prima $30M so how can Prima be overpriced?

Why did I hear such advice when the stock was at .008 when I bought that the stock would fall into a death spiral and that's all that was discussed on Hot Copper at the time. At least I held and made a profit.

Perhaps Prima is a massive scam or Ponzi scheme. If the financial advisor to SpringTree is from New York maybe he is a front for Madoff and really this is just a Madoff company. Maybe I'm Madoff and I didn't know?

Actually the real question is why would a person who doesn't own shares and no intention to be an investor, no matter what, be spending a large amount of time researching and trying to warn all of us shareholders that Prima ovarian cancer vaccine is a sham despite all of the medical evidence, doctors and facts saying otherwise? Something for everybody to ask why and think about and also reflect on how some day trader manipulates the price to day trade fear on all of us. Stick to the fundamentals that this is undervalued considerably and in the long term will be re-rated as Dendreon eventually was. When one talks about fundamentals surely the most basic fundamental, hope that's not tautology,is survival of the company. This has been achieved, so no matter what the future holds our money now has some value. I hesitate to get into a battle of wits with an unarmed man, but your quasi research uncovers only what you are seeking. As a former mathematician it's the difference between inductive and deductive research. One you look for what you want, the other you reach conclusions on what you find. Hence your postings of yesterday re 7.3c failed to appreciate the release clauses in the Springtree deal. There are pause, cancel or re-negotiation clauses in the agreement which allow for total flexibility for PRR. In effect if the shares increase in value these can come into play as better funding options become available with a get out cash penalty which Mr Easton told me yesterday is in the region of a quarter million dollars. I am hoping you treat this in the way it is meant as I respected your view on the 7.3c enough to go back and look closer. Could I ask you also to check out the OP connection and post all other companies the lawyer has been involved with in Australia. If you do this maybe you could regain some respect. I'm offering you this figtree, sorry olive branch before I post all the good references. If not in the words of Richard Harris in the 1970 movie Cromwell, "A curse on you, leave this house now"