It's a question of legal tenure. See at the end at the major...

It's a question of legal tenure. See at the end at the major operation how Peter is talking in hushed tones. There appears to be fear of upsetting a group there otherwise he would be talking normally as per prior sections of the video.

My point is that fund managers are going to have a hard time justifying making an investment in a company that has disputed legal tenure. Am I wrong? It that not exactly what is showing in the share price, capitalization and EV/oz vs others?

If it is normal not to have legal tenure during exploration, what does that say about legal tenure if a shallow high-grade discovery is made nearby. Does anyone really tink it will be left alone when Peter is afraid to talk normally in front of the local operators?

Come on Tony L, what say you?