Ann: Drilling Confirms Discovery of Large Cu-PGE Sulphide Reefs, page-249

Hello. Are you claiming the TM1 grades are better than GAL? What are you talking about?

1. TM1's line of holes 4, 5, 6 & 7 appear to average 0.6 g/t PGE3 and 0.24% copper

2. TM1's line of holes 8 & 10 appear to average 0.49 g/t PGE3 and 0.18% copper.

3. TM1's line of holes 11 & 12 appear to average 0.46g/t PGE3 and 0.185% copper

4. TM1's line of holes 1, 2 & 3 appear to average 0.00g/t PGE3

5. There is other set of 1, 2 & 3 appearing to average 0.33g/t, then 0.89g/t then 0.42g/t PGE3 and 0.13%, 0.11% and 0.27% copper

GAL is below. GAL appears to have at least double the PGE and around 0.56% CuEq (copper plus nickel equivalent) thus around double even triple the TM1 copper.








1. GAL is a large broad deposit, albeit relatively deep, and not skinny reefs.