“My contribution today is that Dante's reefs are hardly a new discovery or materially higher grades/thickness than previous explorers found.”
Really 2IC, is that all you’ve got?
IMHO it’s easily disproven, take this for example;
The two historic drill holes found a total of 3.12m of significant mineralisation. (One was NSR as it terminated above the reef)
The two TM1 drill holes on either side found a total of 36m of significant mineralisation.
“My contribution today is that Dante's reefs are hardly a new...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 196 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
