Looks like the MEU paleochannel model is correct. HM % look generally very impressive though getting some thin zones in some of the bends. Interesting that while the HM numbers are great, they are nowhere near as high as the MEU % numbers, the thickness of the intervals is not as wide as the MEU HM intervals, and they are not as close to surface as the MEU HM which start from surface. And looks like best extensions are to the west towards the MEU ground. The west extensions have twice the HM grade compared to the eastern section.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $100.2M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 30.0¢ | 30.0¢ | 28.5¢ | $39.00K | 134.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 107953 | 28.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.0¢ | 15000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.41pm 17/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PTR (ASX) Chart |