If it's not ionic you generally need 10,000ppm to be viable. So based on current results 0% is viable if it's not ionic IMO.
If it is ionic around 10-15% of the drill holes have the correct thickness and grade to be considered possible viable. Met results will inform that.
I can share around 20 other companies who have similar projects. (REO in clays) - I have around 40-45 on my watch list in total. (ASX only)
bonus, i agree - but i'm just calibrating the commentary about it being better than proven ionic clays with proven resources with a depth/thickness profile which makes it viable.
MTM to have discrete areas (10-15%) which have the right grade, depth/thickness. That puts it in with the other 20 or so who have either not leached, or leached and proven it's not ionic.
SF2TH
MTM Price at posting:
16.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)