EWthe csiro report maps and cloncurry maps put this in the toole...

First 31 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
xxxxxxwwwww

1,256 Posts.

36

10/10/19

15:01

Post #: 40817132
Share

Originally posted by eastwest101: ↑

Location of collars is only 9m apart - close enough to be a twin in my opinion, especially considering they haven't tested along strike very far in either direction. Typical drill spacing in a steeply vertical ore body would often be in the region of 20-25m for resource drilling but this is early days exploration at Little Duke.

The intention of hole LD19RC025 going to at least 132m depth is obviously to see the same rocks that were drilled by LD18RC06 but in drill core and not tiny RC chips so they can measure the veins and structures and figure out which way the potential ore body is dipping, they can also assay the drill core and see if there is any bias in the sample medium between RC chips and diamond core (useful for gold QA/QC) as well as the fact that diamond core holes can be extended much deeper if required.

Have a look and see how the interpreted geology is changing as they drill more holes and add to their knowledge, thats not unusual either.

As others say - a bit naughty not to include both drill holes on the same section, as they are certainly close enough to each other, and give a better/complete picture of whats going on to (potential) investors.

Expand

EW
the csiro report maps and cloncurry maps put this in the toole creek volcanics within a syncline and looks like on the western side. The cross section shows rocks dipping to the west with the older mt norna quartzite on top of the younger toole creeks???????

Mt freda strikes roughly EW so not sure why others would not want to see a scissor hole? to help with geometry.

Puzzles me that we are getting visuals from this recent (in progress) DDH but none from the last few months drilling.

AMG Price at posting: 9.8¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
3 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply