Agree with above posters that the assay for hole 002 from 29m...

Agree with above posters that the assay for hole 002 from 29m -55m is significantly below the estimate based on the 6% volume fraction reported for the core logging. The logging stated a mix of bornite/chalcopyrite. Given how much copper these sulphide types contain then taking 6% of that should have given much higher copper grades. And that was by far and away the best interval of both drill cores and is only a modest grade ( 0.87% CuEq) . And Hole 001 hardly had any decent % visuals so that will be a duster. Ouch is the right word. Did hold but sold on the news when I did the arithmetic on the % visuals across both cores.