Depending when between the 20th and the end of the month they...

Depending when between the 20th and the end of the month they got the seismic sensors down, TG6 could get the results back this week. The test work on Burmeister should assist with calibration. Does it show a velocity anomaly consistent with a pegmatite where drilling has shown a pegmatite?

If it does, where else does that velocity signature appear?

The best case scenario is that velocity anomalies consistent with existing thicker pegmatite intercepts in Burmeister are observed and there's a bigger anomaly in the Burmeister area that is practical to drill with the existing PoW. This would allow a rapid confirmation of the seismic signatures. This is possibly why TG6 has held off punching 200m+ deeper holes around RCD24 to see if seismic provided a better signature on where to drill.

The next component of the best case scenario is that it identifies a large velocity anomaly consistent with a pegmatite in an area that would create the soil anomalies being observed.