Once again you state opinion as fact. Are you going to draw some...

Once again you state opinion as fact. Are you going to draw some artificial distinction between police/ security forces and the city they protect.

https://www.droneshield.com/sectors/law-enforcement

A look at the Singapore Police Force’s counter-drone system
https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ram-mandir-up-police-to-deploy-anti-drone-tech-to-strengthen-security-677729

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/25/home-office-install-anti-drone-detectors-protect-uk-aerial-terror/

https://www.wionews.com/videos/france-to-deploy-anti-drone-system-to-protect-paris-2024-olympic-games-623561

https://www.unmannedairspace.info/counter-uas-systems-and-policies/new-york-federal-agencies-release-results-of-counter-drone-technology-demonstration-in-lower-manhattan/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/elbit-systems-secures-contract-to-deliver-counter-uas-solution-to-the-netherlands/ar-AA1fznwA

that is just a quick search.

Now you can respond that none of these news items involve DRO and there is a clear pattern of using home developed systems and I would not argue with you. It is a crowded field and moat is of concern to me but recent sales and partnerships go some way to alleviating those. Quality of clients and partners etc. But to say that there is no interest is not correct and imo slowness in adoption is more a reflection of the slowness of beauracracies, and the relatively new nature of the industry and the threats.