Lots of "expressions of reservations" throughout from both sides, and as for the conclusion that isn't a conclusion.... pfftt! Full of contradictory lawyer verbiage. And, why the hell didn't Ecograf provide the necessary amendments (which were known) in the first place?
We have so-called "patentable subject matter" but to what avail even if substantiated? Given the costs involved, it won't likely have been worth it.
At the end of the day, though, our process is patented in the US and that's more important for us than here in Aust. Big winners will be the Aussie patent lawyers.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.5¢ |
Change
0.010(3.51%) |
Mkt cap ! $133.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 29.5¢ | 30.0¢ | 28.5¢ | $94.32K | 319.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10652 | 29.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.5¢ | 37922 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.57pm 25/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EGR (ASX) Chart |