Ann: EdenCrete - Continued Market Progress in Colorado, page-102

Then there was a FOLLOWUP in 2017 of 150' of road over 2 lanes and an access ramp.

Four years later and still no report.

But don't worry it is only the company saying it so we have to believe PMF over company announcements.

Company announcements - not an Engineers Report.

No technical report has ever been released that shows Edencrete is cost effective. AFAIK no official document has ever been released by either CDOT or GDOT engineers actually endorsing Edencrete. The Seer Bvd trial specifically ignored cost considerations.

It was literally decided in December 2020 that DoTI would specify Edencrete going forward and 1 completed (winter) quarter is all the evidence you have that they have yet to follow up.

Standard practice is to produce a Final Engineers Report after two years. Instead we just have crickets chirping after five years.

What appears to be happening is Georgia and Colorado bureaucrats and politicians pushing endless cherry-picked trials in the hope of private sector uptake. Yet not one document bearing a GDOT or CDOT engineers signature supporting Edencrete has ever been released to the public.

Outside Georgia and Colorado interest in Edencrete seems to seems to be essentially non-existent. Maybe because there are no politicians pushing it's use.