I do not think a second test pour should be considered as...

I do not think a second test pour should be considered as negative. In all seriousness, I think it should be considered as positive. It simply shows that GDOT wants the product and before making a firm commitment to take on Edencrete, they want a second confirmation for the test result. In any scientific experiment, you do not proclaim your result as successful with just one experiment. Repeats of similar successful experiments are what scientists are looking for.

I agree that we are in the waiting period and sharks are using this time slot to play games.


I see many had criticized the Solomon bros for bad management. Undoubtedly, there were mistakes made before and many in this forum had lost money. I can understand the anger that still exist. However, I think this current project has a firm footing and the gradual progression looks steady enough for me to hold. Management better get this right this time. If not, they would have dug their own graves!!
DYOR and GLTA