I may be a bit late with this hypothetical, but what if -1)...

I may be a bit late with this hypothetical, but what if -
1) Resolution 1 is passed and Brent Jones becomes a Director; and
2) Resolution 2 is passed and Peter Brook becomes a Director; and
3) Resolution 3 is passed and Garry Crole is removed as a Director; and
4) Resolution 4 is defeated and Kevin Pattison is retained as Director (he was, after all, re-elected in November 2023 with 99.98% of the 62.6m shares voted at the AGM).
The Board would then comprise Sweeney (as Chairman); Pattison; Jones and Brook - a four-person Board (50% incumbents/50% newbies).
Then, does the SEQ Constitution grant the Chairman an additional vote to break any Board vote tie? If not, then nothing can change unless there is a 3/1 or 4/0 vote.
And this Board composition would leave Crole retained as CEO but without a Board vote.
Not sure what is worse? (a) a Jones + Brook majority over Sweeney if all 4 resolutions are passed and the Board reduces to 3 Directors; or (b) a 2/2 split of Jones + Brook v Pattison + Sweeney. That would certainly test Sweeney's independence!