My personal view is that there won't be a minimum in this case. It would mean a lot of NMT holders would miss out on the chance to purchase the additional shares and considering they have made a concerted effect to ensure Widgie is initially owned by NMT holder, I don't think they would waste that effort by setting a minimum.
That is just my opinion, I maybe wrong. Either way, I love how NMT is looking after its existing holders. A lot of smaller companies that demerge could learn a lot from them.
My personal view is that there won't be a minimum in this...
Add NMT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $74.73M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 12.0¢ | 13.0¢ | 11.5¢ | $73.91K | 605K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 112289 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 12.0¢ | 78947 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.47pm 22/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.005 ( 0.61 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 12.5¢ | 13.0¢ | 11.5¢ | 92725 | ||
| Last updated 13.11pm 22/05/2024 ? | |||||
| NMT (ASX) Chart |