The value of the company will soon be known and had money not...

The value of the company will soon be known and had money not been squandered during the months of the previous four member board, which you seemed okay with, this project would have been far more advanced.
You seem to overlook how this company had been going down a slippery hole well before Heron showed any interest in tipping money into exploration at Copper Hill.
Not only did it not deliver on completing a budget drilling program, it raised further capital which supposedly was for drilling, but again we saw no drilling, nothing but an empty cash account.
One can blame whoever, the point is this company under the previous regime has lacked credibility and one could easily form the opinion that both long term and recent shareholders have not been given much consideration.
If as you say your particular interest in GCR is as a direct result of your share holding in Heron shares, then, I find that your remarks to date have always favoured HQ Mining and clearly not that of a Heron holder. Most share holders can clearly see that HQ's intention has been to pick up what appears to be a potentially EXCELLENT asset in Copper Hill for a song while at the same time, keeping a lid on the prospects there until they get the major holding while keeping it "in the family?"

As a supposed Heron holder, why wouldn't you feel somewhat deceived by Heron's initial investment into this project which was never completed and think it fair and reasonable that Heron's 18 month investment would return them a LOSS of approximately $500,000?
I am sure most Heron holders would be more worried about that aspect than being completely oblivious to the "clayton's type of offer which opportunistic to say the least"
After next week the decks will hopefully be cleared and GCR through the issue of shares to contractors in lieu of cash will be in a position to raise capital for long awaited further drilling.