"There even no protection in corp act from a large holder banning a hybrid meeting!"
The Supreme Court has ruled Wu Tao's motion does not require an extraordinary general meeting of NTU and can be put at the AGM.
It DID NOT rule the motion cannot be put, nor was it asked to.
Shareholder democracy and citizen democracy are not identical - one share one vote and one citizen one vote are different and appropriate in each case.
I appreciate it is difficult to understand civic freedoms and how the rule of law and an incorruptible judiciary operate from a carrel in China.
Ash
"There even no protection in corp act from a large holder...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ILU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$5.84 |
Change
-0.040(0.68%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.515B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $5.88 | $5.97 | $5.77 | $12.54M | 2.146M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2883 | $5.83 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $5.84 | 10705 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 07/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ILU (ASX) Chart |